Built for your agents, owned by you.
Your AI tools work from one set of notes you keep. Each tool sees only what you share, and every change records who made it, why, and when.
We’ll talk with you before we set anything up.
Record
Review queue
Agents
Settings
Reyes Studio
Dana Reyes
Record
We take a project only when one named person answers for its decisions.
Every engagement starts from a signed scope.
Projects without a named owner start with two weeks of scoping.
Scoping calls name the decision owner first.
Every quote names who answers for each phase.
Operators don’t mainly lack information. They lack a place where “we decided this” is distinct from a draft, a chat, or a model’s best guess.
When that line blurs, people re-argue settled questions and agents confidently invent the missing pieces.
Decisions change. The record keeps what they replaced.
When you supersede a decision, the new version is current and the old one stays reachable as history — with who vouched for each, and why it changed.
illustrative example · not a customer story
We take a project only when one named person answers for its decisions.
- answerable
- Dana Reyes
- vouched
- 2026-08-18
- domain
- engagements
- rests on
- Every engagement starts from a signed scope.
rationale
As of August, two projects stalled under shared ownership. “Clear” was being read as “agreed by the team.” One named person removes the ambiguity.
lineage · 1 earlier version
v1 · superseded · 2026-03-02 → 2026-08-18 · vouched by Dana Reyes
We only take projects with a clear decision owner.
How a decision moves
illustrative example · not a customer story
- 1
Proposal
An agent or a person drafts a claim:
We only take projects with a clear decision owner.
- 2
Vouch
A person vouches for it, and their name stands behind it. Nothing enters canon any other way.
- 3
Use
Later, a person or agent retrieves it when scoping a new project, instead of re-deriving the rule from old threads.
- 4
Supersession
Months later you replace it with a sharper rule. The old version stays reachable as history; the new one is current.
Agents draft. A person vouches.
Agents can draft and propose. They never vouch. Clerical work can shrink without inferred intent standing in for commitments someone answers for.
Record
Review queue
Agents
Settings
Reyes Studio
Dana Reyes
Review queue
Projects without a named owner start with two weeks of scoping.
proposed · Dana’s agent · scribe
Projects without a named owner start with two weeks of scoping.
not in the record until a person vouches
would rest on
We take a project only when one named person answers for its decisions.
What Wanshi is, and is not
- is
- A record of what your business has decided to stand behind, who vouched for it, and what a newer decision replaces — so people and agents work from the same context.
- is not
- An operating system for your whole company, a workflow runner, or a promise that every agent everywhere will obey your record.
- for
- Operators willing to make important commitments explicit, who want a more capable picture of the operation, not merely a cheaper one.
- won’t claim
- How much you’ve stored. Choosing what can’t be safely inferred matters more than volume.
current · v2
We take a project only when one named person answers for its decisions.
v1 · earlier version
current · v2
We take a project only when one named person answers for its decisions.
- a person stands behind it
- cited source
- proposed · waiting for a person
- Illustration, not a real customer’s record.